Approaches to diagnosing dementia syndrome in general practice: Determining the value of gestalt judgment, clinical history and tests.
Award Number
108804/Z/15/ZStatus / Stage
CompletedDates
14 September 2015 -13 March 2021
Duration (calculated)
05 years 05 monthsFunder(s)
Wellcome TrustFunding Amount
£321,248.00Contracted Centre
University of BristolContracted Centre Webpage
Principal Investigator
Dr Sam CreavinPI Contact
Sam.Creavin@bristol.ac.ukPI ORCID
0000-0002-6772-7111WHO Catergories
Development of clinical assessment of cognition and functionMethodologies and approaches for risk reduction research
Disease Type
Dementia (Unspecified)CPEC Review Info
Reference ID | 308 |
---|---|
Researcher | Reside Team |
Published | 12/06/2023 |
Data
Aims
I will investigate whether an evaluation in general practice can have comparable test accuracy to a specialist opinion for diagnosing dementia in symptomatic elderly people. Objective 1: I will systematically review the test accuracy of general practitioners gestalt clinical judgment for the diagnosis of dementia in symptomatic primary care patients and, if indicated, perform a meta-analysis. My hypothesis is that the utility of the gestalt clinical judgment of general practitioners in diagn osing dementia is better than chance but inferior to specialist assessment. Objective 2: I will conduct an empirical, prospective, diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) study comparing GP gut feeling , blood tests, neuroimaging, index collection of cognitive tests suitable for GPs and specialist assessment to a reference consensus expert panel diagnosis. I will identify the most useful components of a diagnostic evaluation in general practice. My hypothesis is that a combination of brief cognitive tests adds diagnostic value to a GP’s gestalt judgment. Objective 3: I will conduct exploratory qualitative research to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of GP diagnosis of dementia for patients and clinicians, based on the set of tests that I identify as most useful.